{"id":926,"date":"2010-10-07T17:09:46","date_gmt":"2010-10-07T21:09:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/julijasukys.com\/?p=926"},"modified":"2010-10-07T17:09:46","modified_gmt":"2010-10-07T21:09:46","slug":"revisiting-the-question-of-titles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/julijasukys.com\/?p=926","title":{"rendered":"Revisiting the question of titles"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I recently joined a women’s writing network called Shewrites<\/a>, and have been following a discussion on titles. People post their working titles, and the community reacts. On the one hand, it’s a great opportunity to get a lot of quick feedback. But on the other, it’s made me realize that we’re not all on the page when thinking about what makes a good title. So I wanted to raise the question here again.<\/p>\n

There have been objections to titles put forth on the Shewrites list on the grounds that they don’t tell exactly<\/em> what a book is about. It’s an objection I struggle with a lot, especially since I write non-fiction. But, as I look around my study and at some of my favorite books of non-fiction, here’s what I see:<\/p>\n

The Year of Magical Thinking
\nAlgerian White
\nNox
\nAutobiography of Red<\/p>\n

I, for one, like titles that hint rather than baldly declare what the book is about. I like titles that are evocative and a bit poetic. I like titles that reveal their meanings fully once you’re part-way through a text. But I may be in the minority in this respect.<\/p>\n

I’m interested to hear what you think is important in a title. How much does a title have to tell you? How tolerant of the abstract are we when it comes to titles? What are your favorites, and why?<\/p>\n

[Photo: sleeping sun]<\/p>\n

\"Share<\/a>